Distinct Strategies to Hair Removal

Hair is this emotive subject and with human nature being human nature, what we want we can’t have and what we have we don’t want! Frizzy hair and we want straight, straight hair and we want curly, brunette and we want blonde, blonde and we want red. Likewise upper lip hair on a lady, so valued as an indication of exquisite beauty using areas of the world, is vilified by our Western society.

Unwanted hair is just a common problem affecting the majority of women to varying degrees throughout their lives and prompting the utilization of various temporary types of hair reduction or hair management systems. It causes great distress, and it’s often followed by feelings of poor self-confidence, an expression of isolation and low self worth.

Since the instances when bearded ladies in Victorian travelling fairs were displayed for entertainment and ridicule, Western society has nurtured a stigma about excess hair. Many women are pressured into tremendous lengths to remove any trace of hair from any and all of the body as they think it to be unattractive and unappealing. However it’s not merely women that are now affected… increasingly the male gender is susceptible to pressure from the ‘fashion’ and celebrity world and unwanted hair could be just as vilified by the male population nowadays because the female.

Different Methods of Hair Removal

Superfluous hair growth could be brought on by many factors, such as for instance, hormone imbalance, (during puberty, pregnancy and menopause), genetics and ethnicity, hereditary, medication or topical stimulation e.g. waxing or tweezing. Therefore, electrolysis – the only permanent method of hair removal, is cure that’s in great demand by female and transsexual clients and more recently, as a result of society’s attitudes, how many male clients is increasing.

To generally meet this need there as been many hair removal measures some which return centuries in history. Hair removal has existed since caveman times but interestingly the areas of the body we are removing hair from have differed on the ages. Removing hair from the top and face of men was originally not for vanity purposes but for survival. There is evidence that cavemen did this but in addition the ancient Egyptians and it absolutely was undertaken, we imagine, for protection, as scraping off the beard and hair on the top would take away the main advantage of an adversary having anything to grab onto as well as having less mites!

In ancient Egypt, Greece, and Middle Eastern countries, removing body hair was important. In fact these women removed most of the body hair, with the exception of eyebrows. Egyptian women removed their head hair and pubic hair was considered uncivilized by both sexes! It had been also considered uncivilized for guys to have hair on the face. Undesired facial hair was the mark of a slave or servant, or of a person of lower class. The ancient Egyptians used a form of razors made from flint or bronze because the razor wasn’t invented till the 1760’s by French barber, Jean Jacques Perret.

Additionally they used a way of temporary hair removal called sugaring. A sticky paste (bees wax was sometimes used) would be applied to your skin, a reel of cloth was pressed onto the wax and yanked off – very same of waxing today. Wealthy women of the Roman Empire would remove their body hair with pumice stones, razors, tweezing and pastes. There clearly was also another technique used called threading which is recently seeing a resurgence in popularity. Thin string or yarn would be placed through the fingers of both hands, and quickly stroked on the area. This repetitive process captured the hair and effectively tweezed, ripped or pulled the unwanted hair out. Throughout the Elizabethan times the practice of hair removal, (not of leg, armpit or pubic hair), of the eyebrows and the hair from their foreheads to be able to give the look of a lengthier brow and forehead was fashionable. It’s startling to note well-known influence ‘fashion’ has played in hair removal from the very beginning.

Waxing, sugaring, depilatory creams, bleaching, shaving, sugaring, plucking, threading and even battery-powered tweezers multiple-plucking systems, are all temporary methods that numerous people try today. In fact new hair removal devices seem to seem like buses – every 20 minutes approximately! However, technology has managed to move on and with it, it seems that there are some restricted and doubtful types of hair removal. X-ray and photodynamic methods come in a restricted category because the former has been banned in certain countries just like the USA and the latter are just in experimental stages. Electric tweezers, transdermal electrolysis, and microwaves are a number of the doubtful methods in that there’s no established data on the effectiveness.

Electrolysis remains the only proven permanent method of hair removal and many women and indeed many men, have benefited out of this tried and trusted treatment. It’s the case that electrologists are privileged to witness a dramatic transformation within their clients, from a shy, introverted personality in the beginning of a program of treatments, to a comfortable and happy individual once treatment is underway and results become apparent.

Whatever your opinion of hair, ‘removing it’ inside our Western society is a multiple million pound industry. This type of huge money making machine though will have significantly more than its great amount of misconceptions, misunderstandings, myths and legends none which relate much to the hard reality truth. The huge profit led hair removal industry has its great amount of charlatans and scams all attracted by the huge profit led opportunities.

Hair Removal methods are both permanent and temporary. The English dictionary definition of ‘permanent’ states: perpetual, everlasting. With this particular in mind there’s just one system in the marketplace today that will totally prove ‘permanent’ hair removal primarily because of its longevity, client testimony and satisfaction and that’s electrolysis. Invented in 1875 electrolysis offers permanent removal of hair for many hair types and colours and all skin types and colours. It continues to be utilised in hospitals by surgeons and ophthalmologists for trichaisis and other distortions of the eyelashes as well supporting a medical facility laser hair removal departments. It can also be considered a significant tool in the job of veterinary surgeons for animals (primarily horses and dogs) for the permanent removal of distorted and in-growing eyelashes. It offers cosmetic relief for the consumer with mild hirsute problems to the individual with seriously hirsute problems and for the transgender patient who may require several hours of treatment.

How to remove hair permanently from the face, legs, and body

Apparently there has been confusing messages coming from the regulatory bodies on definitions of what the language ‘permanent’, ‘removal’ or ‘reduction’ in the hair removal industry actually mean. Agreement was reached when the hairs which were removed don’t grow back for an amount of one year after the last treatment, permanent reduction could be claimed. Electrolysis, invented in 1875 remains to this day, the one method legally allowed to claim ‘permanent removal’ ;.

The newer technologies such as for instance LASER (Light Amplification Stimulated Emission of Radiation) and IPL (Intense Pulse Light) were initially launched as competitors of electrolysis and initially marketed as THE answer for many permanent hair removal. This, it’s now realised, reaches best, somewhat nave and at worst, certainly misleading. The stark reality is that this is wishful thinking and nowadays ‘claims’ tend to be more realistic. The reality is that whilst they’ve their successes there is also their limitations – they can’t treat all hair colours and types and all skin colours successfully and they now accept their limitations and embrace electrolysis and electrologists as their back up.

Laser and IPL are allowed by the FDA to claim permanent ‘reduction’ although not permanent ‘removal’ of hair. The reality is this newer technology is brilliant for big areas and for dark hair. For grey or white hair it just simply doesn’t work. Laser and IPL target the melanin in the hair and if the hair is grey or white there’s no melanin remaining in the hair because of it to target. Along with this, for unknown reason(s) not all the hair reacts to treatment and results vary from 85% – 95% success. The residual 5% – 15% hair will soon be stripped of its melanin (thus appearing white) but still stubbornly continues to grow. This then leaves the only option of ‘permanent hair removal’ down seriously to additional electrolysis treatment to complete the job. Laser and IPL are now recognised to be always a hair ‘management’ system and clients are advised that regrowth may occur.

Photoepilator light energy was launched in 1969 and was developed from research into laser hair removal. Photoepilators use a burst of filtered light aimed at one hair at a time. After the focus of the light, the hair is tweezed. Like any laser and light instrument, the light utilized in the unit is targeted contrary to the blood and melanin pigments in the hair and heats them up. To enable this method, fibre-optic probes were inserted in to the hair follicle through that the light was flashed. There is no clinical data published to date to guide any permanency claims and there’s no established data on its effectiveness.

The tweezer method using its unsubstantiated claim of ‘permanent hair removal’ was patented in 1959. This system works by passing an household current through the tweezers, which holds the hair at first glance of your skin by grasping them for many minutes. Electricity enters through the hair to its root and claims to permanently damage it. The scientific community has reservations because the claim of electricity destroying the main of the hair does not have any scientific backup.

Transcutaneous and Transdermal offers ‘permanent Hair Removal’ but no clinical data has been published currently to determine the declare that permanent hair removal is possible using these methods. In 1985 when the utilization of AC electric tweezers was stopped, the manufacturers made some modifications in the apparatus. Adhesive patches rather than cotton swabs were introduced and a name change into transcutaneous hair removal. It uses the thought of direct current (DC) for transdermal delivery of drugs (iontophoresis) without the utilization of a needle. A DC household current is passed through a conductive gel at first glance of your skin via an adhesive patch added to the skin. The hair root is claimed to be damaged permanently by the household current that travels down seriously to the hair follicle.

To date no clinical data can be obtained and the laws of physics don’t support the claims created by the manufacturers. 激光脫毛邊間好 Hair does not conduct electricity but skin does. As electricity passes through the medium of poor resistance, it’ll spread along the surface of your skin rather than passing through the hair. Therefore, just like the tweezer method, the argument so it will reach the main of the hair to destroy it does not have any scientific backup.

Ultrasound hair removal claims that ultrasound waves are channelled precisely down the hair shaft and along the way they transform to thermal energy that super heats the hair growth areas and inhibits regrowth. It’s stated that the waves are bound to the hair shaft and don’t dissipate into your skin prevents any side effects.

Ultrasound hair removal offers ‘total hair removal’ and claims to function as ‘next generation of long haul hair removal devices’ ;.It states in its marketing material it is ‘The hair removal solution’ and that ‘no additional hair appears in the same follicle proving that this is a long-term treatment’ ;.The FDA hasn’t given the outcomes currently regarding a credit card applicatoin to advertise in April 2010 of the latest device.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *