You are able to avoid two calls to the bookmaker and lock in today’s line on a later game by telling your bookmaker you want to make an “if” bet. “If” bets can also be made on two games kicking off at exactly the same time. The bookmaker will wait until the first game is over. If the very first game wins, he’ll put an equal amount on the second game although it has already been played.
Although an “if” bet is really two straight bets at normal vig, you cannot decide later that you no longer want the second bet. After you make an “if” bet, the second bet can not be cancelled, even though the second game has not gone off yet. If the very first game wins, you will have action on the second game. For this reason, there is less control over an “if” bet than over two straight bets. When both games you bet overlap with time, however, the only way to bet one as long as another wins is by placing an “if” bet. Obviously, when two games overlap with time, cancellation of the second game bet is no issue. It must be noted, that whenever both games start at different occuring times, most books won’t allow you to fill out the second game later. You have to designate both teams when you make the bet.
You can make an “if” bet by saying to the bookmaker, “I want to make an ‘if’ bet,” and then, “Give me Team A IF Team B for $100.” Giving your bookmaker that instruction is the identical to betting $110 to win $100 on Team A, and then, as long as Team A wins, betting another $110 to win $100 on Team B.
If the very first team in the “if” bet loses, there is no bet on the second team. Irrespective of whether the second team wins of loses, your total loss on the “if” bet could be $110 when you lose on the very first team. If the very first team wins, however, you would have a bet of $110 to win $100 going on the second team. In that case, if the second team loses, your total loss could be just the $10 of vig on the split of both teams. If both games win, you would win $100 on Team A and $100 on Team B, for an overall total win of $200. Thus, the maximum loss on an “if” could be $110, and the maximum win could be $200. This is balanced by the disadvantage of losing the entire $110, rather than $10 of vig, each time the teams split with the very first team in the bet losing.
Bettors soon found that how you can avoid the uncertainty brought on by the order of wins and loses is to make two “if” bets putting each team first. As opposed to betting $110 on ” Team A if Team B,” you would bet just $55 on ” Team A if Team B.” and then produce a second “if” bet reversing the order of the teams for another $55. The 2nd bet would put Team B first and Team A second. This sort of double bet, reversing the order of exactly the same two teams, is named an “if/reverse” or sometimes just a “reverse.”
If both teams win, the end result is the same just like you played a single “if” bet for $100. You win $50 on Team A in the very first “if bet, and then $50 on Team B, for an overall total win of $100. In the second “if” bet, you win $50 on Team B, and then $50 on Team A, for an overall total win of $100. The 2 “if” bets together cause a total win of $200 when both teams win.
If both teams lose, the end result would also be exactly like in the event that you played a single “if” bet for $100. Team A’s loss would run you $55 in the very first “if” combination, and nothing would look at Team B. In the second combination, Team B’s loss would run you $55 and nothing would look at to Team A. You’d lose $55 on all the bets for an overall total maximum loss of $110 whenever both teams lose.
The difference occurs once the teams split. As opposed to losing $110 when the very first team loses and the second wins, and $10 when the very first team wins but the second loses, in the reverse you will lose $60 on a separate whichever team wins and which loses. It calculates this way. If Team A loses you will lose $55 on the very first combination, and have nothing going on the winning Team B. In the second combination, you will win $50 on Team B, and have action on Team A for a $55 loss, resulting in a net loss on the second mix of $5 vig. The loss of $55 on the very first “if” bet and $5 on the second “if” bet offers you a mixed loss of $60 on the “reverse.” When Team B loses, you will lose the $5 vig on the very first combination and the $55 on the second combination for exactly the same $60 on the split..
We’ve accomplished this smaller loss of $60 in place of $110 when the very first team loses with no reduction in the win when both teams win. In both single $110 “if” bet and both reversed “if” bets for $55, the win is $200 when both teams cover the spread. The bookmakers would not put themselves at that sort of disadvantage, however. The gain of $50 whenever Team A loses is fully offset by the extra $50 loss ($60 in place of $10) whenever Team B is the loser. Thus, the “reverse” doesn’t actually save us anything, however it does have the advantage of making the danger more predictable, and avoiding the worry as to which team to put first in the “if” bet.
DON’T, when you can win a lot more than 52.5% or even more of your games. If you fail to consistently achieve a profitable percentage, however, making “if” bets if you bet two teams can save you money.
For the winning bettor, the “if” bet adds some luck to your betting equation that doesn’t belong there. If two games are worth betting, then they ought to both be bet. Betting on one should not be produced dependent on whether you win another. On the other hand, for the bettor who has a negative expectation, the “if” bet will prevent him from betting on the second team whenever the very first team loses. By preventing some bets, the “if” bet saves the negative expectation bettor some vig.
The $10 savings for the “if” bettor results from the truth that he is not betting the second game when both lose. Set alongside the straight bettor, the “if” bettor comes with an additional cost of $100 when Team A loses and Team B wins, but he saves $110 when Team A and Team B both lose.
The rule for the winning bettor is precisely opposite. Something that keeps the winning bettor from betting more games is bad, and therefore “if” bets will cost the winning handicapper money. Once the winning bettor plays fewer games, he has fewer winners. แทงมวยไทย Understand that next time someone lets you know that how you can win is to bet fewer games. An intelligent winner never wants to bet fewer games. Since “if/reverses” workout exactly the same as “if” bets, they both place the winner at an equal disadvantage.
Exceptions to the Rule – When a Winner Should Bet Parlays and “IF’s”
Just like all rules, there are exceptions. “If” bets and parlays must certanly be created by successful with an optimistic expectation in just two circumstances::
If you have no other choice and he must bet either an “if/reverse,” a parlay, or a teaser; or
When betting co-dependent propositions.
The only real time I will consider that you have no other choice is if you’re the best man at your friend’s wedding, you are waiting to walk down the aisle, your laptop looked ridiculous in the pocket of your tux which means you left it in the automobile, you simply bet offshore in a deposit account with no credit line, the book has a $50 minimum phone bet, you prefer two games which overlap with time, you pull out your trusty cell 5 minutes before kickoff and 45 seconds before you should walk to the alter with some beastly bride’s maid in a frilly purple dress in your arm, you try to make two $55 bets and suddenly realize you simply have $75 in your account.
Because the old philosopher used to say, “Is that what’s troubling you, bucky?” If so, hold your face up high, put a smile on that person, look for the silver lining, and produce a $50 “if” bet in your two teams. Obviously you might bet a parlay, but as you will dsicover below, the “if/reverse” is an excellent replacement for the parlay if you’re winner.
For the winner, the best method is straight betting. In the event of co-dependent bets, however, as already discussed, there is an enormous advantage to betting combinations. With a parlay, the bettor is getting the benefit of increased parlay odds of 13-5 on combined bets that have greater than the normal expectation of winning. Since, by definition, co-dependent bets must often be contained within exactly the same game, they must be produced as “if” bets. With a co-dependent bet our advantage arises from the truth that we make the second bet only IF one of many propositions wins.
It’d do us no good to straight bet $110 each on the favorite and the underdog and $110 each on the over and the under. We’d simply lose the vig regardless of how the favorite and over or the underdog and under combinations won. As we’ve seen, when we play two out of 4 possible results in two parlays of the favorite and over and the underdog and under, we can net a $160 win when among our combinations comes in. When to choose the parlay or the “reverse” when making co-dependent combinations is discussed below.
Choosing Between “IF” Bets and Parlays
Predicated on a $110 parlay, which we’ll use for the goal of consistent comparisons, our net parlay win when among our combinations hits is $176 (the $286 win on the winning parlay minus the $110 loss on the losing parlay). In a $110 “reverse” bet our net win could be $180 each time among our combinations hits (the $400 win on the winning if/reverse minus the $220 loss on the losing if/reverse).